奋斗

报道称微软承认无法修复 Win11 安全启动兼容性问题_我的网站

A |     

    A photo shows WuXi AppTec in the Waigaoqiao Bonded Area of the Shanghai Free Trade Zone. Photo: VCG
A US federal judge on Friday temporarily "barred the Pentagon from including Chinese biotechnology group WuXi AppTec on a list of companies believed to support Beijing's military," according to Reuters. Chinese experts said the ruling sends a positive signal for Chinese companies operating in the US, showing that Washington's arbitrary, fact-deficient national security blacklists are not beyond challenge and that firms should make greater use of legal means to defend their legitimate rights.
US District Judge James Boasberg issued an order blocking enforcement of the designation of WuXi in June after the company filed suit. WuXi in a statement welcomed the court's ruling, saying it "relieves us from the immediate adverse consequences" of the Defense Department's designation during the litigation. "We believe that the facts, as demonstrated in our court filings, will prevail after an objective and fair judicial review," a WuXi spokesperson said, according to the report. 
A South China Morning Post report noted that the ruling represents an early legal victory for one of China's largest pharmaceutical research and manufacturing service providers and a setback for Washington's expanding use of national-security restrictions against major Chinese commercial companies.
Gao Lingyun, a research fellow at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times that the Pentagon's controversial "list-first, evidence-later" approach has bred massive operational uncertainty for Chinese enterprises conducting legitimate business in the US. By arbitrarily imposing restrictive labels before presenting credible proof, Washington creates an opaque and unpredictable regulatory environment that disrupts normal commercial expectations. 
The US Department of Defense released its updated Section 1260H list on June 8, marking the first time WuXi AppTec was formally included, alongside Alibaba, Baidu, BYD and Unitree Robotics, among others. 
On June 12, WuXi AppTec announced it had filed suit against the Department of Defense in the US District Court for the District of Columbia. The company said the department's decision was erroneous and lacked factual basis or support under applicable statutes and case law.
He Weiwen, a senior fellow at the Center for China and Globalization, noted that when Chinese companies face unfair and unjustified suppression in the US, they cannot rely solely on corporate statements or diplomatic representations; they must also protect themselves through legal means. Filing suit in federal court is entirely necessary and correct, he said.
"In the past, quite a few Chinese companies had nothing to do with so-called military matters but were hit with US countervailing and anti-dumping measures. Many won their cases after appealing to the Court of International Trade. Legal recourse is an indispensable tool and one we need to take more seriously," he said.
In January 2021, Xiaomi was placed on a similar Pentagon list. The Chinese company later announced on May 26, 2021 that a US court has removed the company's designation as a military-related company and lifted all restrictions on US persons buying or holding its stock, Reuters reported. 
The designation has so far had little impact on WuXi AppTec's business. The company reported on August 3 that first-half revenue rose 38.9 percent year-on-year to 28.9 billion yuan, while net profit attributable to shareholders climbed 29.4 percent to 11.08 billion yuan — its first half-year profit above the 10-billion-yuan mark, said media reports.
When asked about US placing several Chinese technology companies including Alibaba, Tencent, BYD, on a list of firms that it says aid China's military, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said that China firmly opposes the US overstretching the concept of national security and formulating various types of discriminatory lists to go after Chinese businesses. "We urge the US to correct its wrongdoings, and stop the unwarranted suppression of Chinese businesses. China will do what is necessary to firmly protect their legitimate and lawful rights and interests," said Lin. 
。

B |     IT之家 7 月 21 日消息，科技媒体 Windows Latest 于 7 月 19 日发布博文，报道称在微软承认无法修复 Windows 11 安全启动问题，老电脑受影响最严重。         IT之家曾于 7 月 10 日报道，微软承认由于兼容性问题，导致部分 Windows 11 设备无法正常安装安全启动证书更新。         而最新报道称微软联合宏碁（Acer）、华硕（ASUS）、思科（Cisco）、蓝天电脑（Clevo）、戴尔（Dell）、富士（Fsas / Fujitsu）、荣耀（Honor）、惠普（HP）、联想（Lenovo）、LG、Surface 以及小米公司（以上按字母排序）代表，于 7 月 15 日举办 OEM 安全启动办公会议，共同磋商 Windows 11 安全启动兼容性问题。

C |          安全启动（Secure Boot）内置于 UEFI 固件中的启动安全机制，用于在设备开机阶段验证引导链中的软件是否可信。它主要用于阻止未授权、被篡改或已知存在风险的启动程序加载，常见于 Windows 11 设备的默认安全要求中。         由于 2011 年及更早签发的安全启动证书已过期，微软通过升级安全启动证书，推动 Windows 11 设备更替证书，升级到 2023 年签发的证书上。

D |          微软在最新支持文档中指出，由于兼容性问题，部分 Windows 11 设备无法正常更迭证书，微软为降低风险，并积极与合作伙伴推进解决方案。

E |          最新报道指出，本次会议探讨了各种修复方案，微软工程师提供了详细的技术解答，内容涵盖从 AvailableUpdates 注册表项到企业设备群中置信度评分的工作原理。         该媒体报道称在本次会议活动中，微软和诸多 OEM 厂商讨论后，依然无法妥善解决 Windows 11 安全启动兼容性问题，其中惠普用户受影响最为严重。         IT 管理员 epoch71 表示，他管理超过 7000 台惠普设备，涵盖 G7 至最新 EliteBooks 和 ZBooks 等机型，在升级安全启动证书后遇到兼容性问题，强制证书安装触发 BitLocker 恢复。他按 HP 支持文档手动切换 4 项 Secure Boot BIOS 设置，也出现同样结果。         epoch71 在 EliteBook 640 G10 上测试，BIOS 版本为 V75 01.12.01，使用注册表键强制证书后，每次都进入恢复模式。回退到 V75 01.11.00 后，问题消失。惠普代表与微软在会后未给出后续结论。         另一位用户 Shapalapa 称，EliteBook 840 G6 先停留在“Under Observation – More Data Needed”，安装 01.35.01 BIOS 后继续出现 BitLocker 恢复循环。         Checker-KP 称，其约 700 台 HP EliteBook G9 和 G10 设备中，DB 证书在将注册表键设为 0x5944 后可更新，但 KEK 多次重启后仍回到“Not Started”。         Dell 端也有未解问题。pbormet 称，其 Dell 设备整体更新较顺利，但 OptiPlex 5000 在执行命令时拒绝更新注册表键。

Current article:http://j1x.qiuergejiaolaiaozhuangshi.buzz/bhw/20260826/79714.html

Published on:16:05:50